It used to operate in this manner, but today there are other options. Continue reading if you don’t have confidence in how the internet now operates and think The Social Dilemma is accurate. There is a substitute: Web3.
We must first comprehend what the decentralised web is. The Web2 that we currently use is largely centralised and controlled by large corporations, yet it is quickly becoming Web3. The Metaverse, on the other hand, is how the internet or virtual worlds will converge and integrate into our life so that we may engage with it without effort. In this post, let’s examine the distinctions between Web 3.0 and Metaverse and how they will work in concert going forward.
Web 3.0
The idea behind Web 3.0 is to bring the internet into the future. It is the development of users’ abilities to manage and claim ownership of their works, online material, digital assets, and online personas.
What we are now seeing is called Web 2.0. Businesses concentrate the development and delivery of their goods and services. Use Instagram as an illustration. Do you believe your Instagram posts are yours? No, the platform is wholly owned by the corporation, and all user-generated material is completely under their control. They will block or prohibit you if they so want.
A different illustration is the well-known online game Fortnite. Users have no control over the identities or “owned” things they use in-game. Users are unable to manage and make money from the material they provide on Web 2.0.
It has been falsely claimed to more than 2.5 billion players worldwide that they own their in-game property. They do not possess it.
Yet with Web 3.0, people may produce content that they also own, control, and monetize thanks to the usage of blockchain technology and cryptocurrency. This makes NFTs possible. Are you certain you’ve heard of it?
Peer-to-peer networks, which are essentially a decentralized network of computers instead of the server of a single company, are the basis for many online services. Peer-to-peer networks may be accessed by users thanks to blockchain technology. Anybody with an internet connection and cryptocurrency wallets like Meta mask may conduct permissionless and peer-to-peer transactions in this environment, giving consumers control over their data and eliminating the need for middlemen. Users of various online apps are therefore given back complete control over their digital identities as well as how and when data is exchanged through the use of their private keys.
The world is moving fast to Web3. The internet of assets:
- From AWS to IPFS
- From LLC to DAO
- From Chrome to Brave
- From your bank to Metamask
- From centralized systems to decentralized blockchains
- From Facebook to Steemit
- From Eve Online to Star Atlas
Another problem with the contemporary Web 2.0 internet is data privacy. Since the centralized organizations have complete control over who may use the service, they also have complete control over the data of the users. By consenting to the terms of service, users register to access a service and forfeit their own private information and content in return for the convenience of the service. Web 3.0, on the other hand, gives everyone access to the service, making it impossible for one organization to regulate who may use it. Users can access their private data without having to register, but as they will be the sole custodians, they must also assume all risk related to protecting their own data and assets.
Web2 has likely taken note of this and is already migrating towards Web3. For instance, Twitter has implemented NFT profile picture verification.
Recent Web 3.0 projects have given rise to some amazing new consumer behaviors', such as the explosion of non-fungible tokens (NFTs), play-to-earn (P2E) games, and decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs).
We can see Web 3.0’s possible uses as a set of rules and regulations that are relevant to all internet users as it is portrayed as the standard for a new generation of internet. Web 3.0 would therefore be applicable to the whole internet as opposed to just certain apps.
The Metaverse
The science fiction book “Snow Crash” from 1992 is when the term “metaverse” first appeared. Facebook recently changed its name to “Meta” to bring the Metaverse development into the public eye. Although the Metaverse is envisioned as a 3D immersive environment where we will spend a lot of time socialising, working, amusing ourselves, learning, etc., it is not yet a tangible reality. It combines several technologies, including social media, gaming, virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), and mixed reality (MR).
The Metaverse, to put it simply, is a new method for people to utilize the internet that converts it from 2D to 3D. Web material is turned into three-dimensional objects so that users may interact with it in three dimensions rather than simply clicking and paging through multiple pages and tabs on 2D displays on desktops or mobile devices. Instead of playing games on a 2D webpage, consider playing them online. The website is changed into a 3D environment so that users may explore it, communicate with other users, and participate in games using their avatars. Users have the option to visually engage with web material and fully immerse themselves there. Users can also enjoy an immersive experience visually and physically with the inclusion of virtual reality headsets.
The Metaverse is anticipated to be a new dimension that mirrors our everyday activities and unifies social networking, employment, entertainment, gaming, and education on one platform.
Web 3.0 and the Metaverse — the future
After going over the many definitions of Web 3.0 and the Metaverse, the crucial issue is: How do these two technologies work best together in the future?
The “open and decentralized” metaverse, in which no single body has authority over the data and assets of users, is, in my opinion, the most ideal. However several service companies hold the majority of the existing early-stage metaverses. Others have said that Facebook’s decision to rebrand as “Meta” and hire 10,000 employees to work on constructing the Metaverse are merely a ruse to separate the business from the issues around data security and user privacy. To put it more optimistically, Facebook’s involvement in the Metaverse helped bring resources and expertise together to create its infrastructure and contributed to popularizing the concept of the Metaverse.
Nevertheless, centralized identity providers like Facebook hold the digital identities and information that users generate on their platforms in centralized servers over which they have no authority. This indicates that these businesses simultaneously supply technology, make decisions, and hold data.
These internet businesses frequently fail to protect the interests of its users and our data, as we have seen over the past several years. The adoption of decentralization and user ownership must be prioritized as many new players in the metaverse market sketch out the Metaverse’s future vision; this may be done by following the set of rules and principles provided by Web 3.0.
The Web 3.0 technologies and the metaverse work flawlessly together. Web 3.0 may provide the foundation for connectivity in the Metaverse, despite the fact that it advocates a decentralized web while the Metaverse is a virtual environment. On the other side, the Metaverse’s creator economy may complement Web 3.0’s ambition by creating an entirely new financial system through the use of decentralized solutions.
We must think carefully about the type of internet we want to emphasise in the Metaverse as we transition to decentralized Web 3.0. As the Metaverse is all about the fusion of the virtual and real worlds, it is crucial to establish an open-source, interoperable public chain so that various virtual worlds may connect with one another, transfer resources between them, and seamlessly overlay one another.
Wouldn’t it be wonderful if you could actually control the spacecraft in a video game whatever you wanted to? The users own the Star Atlas spacecraft, which are NFTs.
Despite the recent exponential rise of NFTs, P2E games, and DAOs, Web 3.0 is still far from being completely developed, and there is still more space for technological advancement that will enable a truly immersive metaverse experience.
The new open and decentralized global reality that will exist in virtuality will be made evident by Web 3.0’s metaverse. I’m eager to see
These internet businesses frequently fail to protect the interests of its users and our data, as we have seen over the past several years. The adoption of decentralisation and user ownership must be prioritised as many new players in the metaverse marketplace sketch out the Metaverse’s future vision; this may be done by following the set of rules and principles provided by Web 3.0.
The Web 3.0 technologies and the metaverse work flawlessly together. Web 3.0 may provide the foundation for connectivity in the Metaverse, despite the fact that it advocates a decentralised web while the Metaverse is a virtual environment. On the other side, the Metaverse’s creator economy may complement Web 3.0’s ambition by creating an entirely new financial system through the use of decentralised solutions.
online star atlas versus eve
Wouldn’t it be wonderful if you could actually control the spacecraft in a video game whatever you wanted to? The users own the Star Atlas spacecraft, which are NFTs.
Despite the recent exponential rise of NFTs, P2E games, and DAOs, Web 3.0 is still far from being completely developed, and there is still more space for technological advancement that will enable a truly immersive metaverse experience.
The new open and decentralized global reality that will exist in virtuality will be made evident by Web 3.0’s metaverse. I’m looking forward to seeing how Web 3.0 and the Metaverse develop in the future.
Comments
0 comment